Jump to content

User talk:Georges Stable

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Georges Stable, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Georges Stable! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weronika Anna Rosa (September 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 16:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Qcne, thanks for your valuable quick reply. The artist has been featured in TVN (Discovery Channel Group)(PL) on the most viewed morning show in Poland, Elle Decoration(PL), Activa(PT) (link to making off), her design work is available at Victoria & Albert Museum & was selected and published in the official selection of this year, in London, at the society of botanical artists (https://www.soc-botanical-artists.org/about/about-the-society/), page 99 on the official catalogue (https://www.soc-botanical-artists.org/exhibitions/plantae-2023/). Knowing that a notable part of the publications are as well in Polish, do you think it would be better to publish first in polish? I am only a fan and cannot write in Polish, it will therefore take some time. But I would understand. Many thanks for your support and advices. Have an excellent day/evening. Georges Georges Stable (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Georges Stable. The key thing about "notability" in a Wikipedia context is that we need to see significant coverage of the artist in independent, reliable, secondary sources. This could be newspaper articles (but not interviews), academic work, books, etc.
Most of your sources are primary (i.e., from her own website or exhibitions she exhibited at etc) or interviews, so you've not proven that notability yet.
Genuinely beautiful artwork but articles about artist need to pass the WP:NARTIST criteria. Qcne (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will note, the Polish Wikipedia has less strict criteria than the English one, so you might have an easier time there. Qcne (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well noted. Thanks @Qcne. I'll try to find more references and I believe one or two references are not interviews and from independent source. And I'll follow the trail and try to have a polish version. Many thanks for your guidance. You are very helpful. Have an excellent day. Georges Stable (talk) 20:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Weronika Anna Rosa

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Georges Stable. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Weronika Anna Rosa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]