User talk:Ghostwriterwrites
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Blood Confession, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.alisalibby.com/content.php?page=writing&n=3&b=2&f=2. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The King's Rose
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The King's Rose, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bláthnaid talk 23:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Alisa M. Libby
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alisa M. Libby, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- No Assertion of notability, and no evidence that she meets the notability guidelines for inclusion. Only one Gnews hit, and it is trivial coverage rather than significant. Only 225 unique Ghits, but they are blog posts and listings where the her books are sold. Dawn Bard (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dawn Bard (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The Blood Confession
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Blood Confession, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable book; not even an assertion of notability. Only 175 unique Ghits (when wWikipedia, amazon, barnesandnoble and borders are excluded), and they consist of blog posts and passing mentions, and hits on sites like librarything. Only 2 Gnews hits, and they are brief mentions in "School Library Journal". The standards set in WP:BK have not been met. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The King's Rose
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The King's Rose, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable book - not even an assertion of notability. 268 Ghits, but nothing that comes close to the standard set by WP:BK: "book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself". Nothing relevant in a gnews search. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
The article The Blood Confession has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Only one review does not meet WP:BOOK requirements for notability. The small number of libraries listing it just means it does not automatically the fail, but based upon lack of reliable sources it's clear it is not notable enough to have an article
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DreamGuy (talk) 19:48, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of The Blood Confession for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Blood Confession is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blood Confession until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DreamGuy (talk) 00:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Ghostwriterwrites. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. DreamGuy (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2012 (UTC)