User talk:Gianni ita

Ja ne znam toliko o istoriji Kosova da bih se bavio time. Ako smatraš da je nešto tamo neistina onda izmeni delove koje smatraš netačnim i obrazloži svoje izmene na strani za razgovor kod članka Kosovo. Brisanje cele istorijske sekcije iz članka svakako nije rešenje. PANONIAN (talk) 20:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see any edit summary, it just looked like simple blanking to me. The content of "Armenia has not any socio or political history until 1920. There was not any country with this (armenia)name." really looks like vandalism, maybe some redirect or something would look better. Tawker 20:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I did confuse the two articles, someone was blanking the other page and I guess thats how it happened, sorry about that. At this point it's over my head so there's not much I can do about it now. Tawker 21:03, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

The article is protected because of the edit war. This does not imply endorsement of the current version. David.Monniaux 20:54, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kao što vidiš, članak je zaključan. Ne radi se tu o tome ko više izdrži da vraća na svoju verziju, već ko dokaže da je njegova verzija tačna na strani za razgovor. Stranicu ne možeš ugasiti, samo će biti ovako zaključana dok ne postigneš kompromis sa suprotnom stranom. Idi na stranu za razgovor kod članka Kosovo i tamo napiši šta u članku ne valja i napiši šta bi promenio. To ti je jedini način. PANONIAN (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV (Kosovo)

If you feel that the article is biased, then please add the tag {{NPOV}} to the top of the page and discuss it in the talk page, rather than just removing large chunks. I don't agree/disagree with either version, and know next to nothing about Kosovo. All I did was revert the changes that didn't follow policy. Please also take a look at WP:Neutral Point Of View and WP:Resolving Disputes. I also highly encourage you to take part in the NPOV dispute on the article's talk page after your block expires, since you do know way more than I do, after all. If there is any way I can help, let me know. -Mulder416 22:10, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Zdravo, vidim poceo si i ti malo da posecujes stranicu o Kosovu. Lepo, lepo. Nego, reci mi kako se potpisujem na kraju onog sto napisem, necu da mi posle brisu komentare."

Pa ne posećujem tu stranicu zbog nekog kvazi "patriotizma", već mi je žao tog članka što ga deset puta na dan menjate iz jedne verzije u drugu. Ovo ipak treba da bude enciklopedija, a ne dokazivanje ko ima više prava da vlada nekom teritorijom. Što se potpisa tiče, vrlo je prosto, prvo napiši svoj komentar, a onda na kraju samo četiri puta napiši znak ~ i izaći će tvoj potpis sa datumom. PANONIAN (talk) 21:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So this is a well known vandal of Kosovo site. Nice to know. Hope you can tame this guy, PANONIAN. Hope to have some more understanding from him in the future. Ilir pz 18:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Odgovor

Pa na Vikipediji smeš da menjaš bilo koji članak, jedino što ne smeš to je da vraćaš članak na svoju verziju više od 3 puta na dan (ako to uradiš dobiješ ban). Što se tiče toga kako da napišeš komentar, kad edituješ stranicu da bi je menjao onda svoj komentar napišeš u rubriku "Edit summary" (koja je ispod glavne rubrike) i onda samo klikneš "Save page". Naravno, moraš prvo nešto i da izmeniš na strani da bi ti se komentar video. PANONIAN (talk) 22:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pa to da svako vraća na svoju verziju neki članak se veoma često dešava na Vikipediji. To se zove rat izmena, ili "revert war". Zato postoji pravilo da jedan isti korisnik ne sme jedan isti članak da vraća na svoju verziju više od tri puta u toku 24 časa. Ostalo je već pitanje ko je uporniji i istrajniji. :) PANONIAN (talk) 22:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

Mnogi clanci vezani za Kosovo su problematicni, na razne nacine (npr. probaj ti Ameru da objasnis da Prizren nije u Kosovu vec u Metohiji). Ja trenutno nemam vremena, ali probaj da se povezes sa drugim srpskim korisnicima koji su zainteresovani da rade na tome. Nikola 22:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prizren u Metohiji? :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Dying of laughter. Gotta love this.Ilir pz 21:49, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aj' sto ne mozes Amerima koji za Prizren nikada nisu culi, al' sto se i oni sto zive u Prizrenu prave ludi... A nego gde je nego u Metohiji, nije valjda u Drenici. Nikola 06:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the insult. I know one thing for sure, Prizren is not in Serbia. Live with it. wake up, nebeski narod member.Ilir pz 09:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo, round 2

I'm not an admin, so I can't help by blocking users, but I can revert their edits, and take other measures to keep them from constantly rewriting the article. I've looked at the history, and it's mostly coming from one person, so it won't be hard to deal with it in the future. Someone else has already restored the article to the version you mentioned, or something near it. I'll add this page to my watchlist, and keep an eye on it for now. -Mulder416 19:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala na podršci. Voleo bih da čujem tvoje mišljenje o nekim drugim člancima, pa ako imaš volje da diskutuješ, odgovori mi na stranici za razgovor. Sve najbolje, prijatelju! --Boris Malagurski ₪ 22:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Croatian_historian

I don't think that he hates Serbs. He hates Serbs that are bad guys and to an extent expands this through stereotypics to all Serbs sometimes. There's a big difference. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

Mislim da neće postojati normalan članak o Kosovu dok se njegov konačan status ne reši i dok se albanski korisnici Vikipedije ne slože oko njegovog sadržaja. Ja se lično neću mnogo baviti člancima o Kosovu i Crnoj Gori, sve dok se ne reše njihovi konačni statusi. Onda će imati na čemu da se zasnivaju argumenti u vezi sadržaja članaka, što sada baš nije slučaj, jer je sada više u igri to što neko želi ovo ili ono konačno rešenje za te teritorije, nego nekakvo činjenično stanje. Što se tiče userboxova, nemam pojma kako se prave, moraš pitati nekog ko ima userbox. :) PANONIAN (talk) 20:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement Belgrade

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

See: Talk:Serbia --Hipi Zhdripi 19:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot this username

I wonder which of you forgot to use this username, is it you Asterion, or HRE? very curious! Or now you got so many other usernames, that you forgot the password of this one?Ilir pz 20:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you are trying to say, you ridiculous albanian. I have one and the only user name, i don't know where did you get the idea that i have more user names. Why would you insult me? Gianni ita 20:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the insult. Ilir pz 20:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, --serbiana - talk 02:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admiration

I just want to add another thing. I wanted to say how i admire all the Albanians, and especially all the albanians from Kosovo. There has never been a single conflict between them, they all share the same views about serbs, serbia, kosovo...They always stick to their ideas and plans. They will always repeat their POV, even if it is not totally truthful, and try to explain it to foreigners. They want the story of how they suffered under the Serbs to be retold everywhere and all the time. They understood the importance of lobbying long before any other nationalities from the Balkan peninsula. I admire the albanian people for making plans about independence decades ago, when it seemed that independence is impossible, but they patiently waited for the right moment, and it came, with Milosevic, the person whose statue should be on the main square in Pristina, as he made everything possible (he can stand next to Tito, he was the first one who gave albanians a little hope for independence). For all that, i envy my dear neighbors. Gianni ita 18:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will have to correct your "admiration", Kosovar Albanians were slow in uniting as they did today, and several types of suffering and oppresions finally brought the (admirable by you) situation as it is now. Ironically. And their unification is not against Serbs or Serbia, but against any kind of imposed regime on Kosovo again. Let us have this clear here. One smart move that Ibrahim Rugova took I will always appreciate, he did not inspire any responce (militarily) to Milosevic's provocations to start some kind of uprisal in early 1990s, because we were going to be the lesson for all the rest of republics within ex-Yug that wanted to secceede. Luckily, that did not work, or today we would have a majority of Serbs in Kosovo, and mass graves filled with (more than 10) thousands of bodies of Albanians, and Albanian refugees would be already used to living outside Kosovo (in Albania and all around the world) and Operation Horseshoe would be completed much earlier. Milosevic did plenty to deserve to be mentioned in the black history of Kosovo, and one that destroyed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people (not only in Kosovo) and (hopefully not for a long time) spoiled the coexistence of Serbs and other non-Serbs he terrorized. It would be a shame even if anyone erects a statue of his even in Serbia. Your irony can be felt, but you should know some more facts before you use it. ilir_pz 18:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh and another thing, the reason most of us Albanian Wikipedians trying to explain issues to international readers here is to show them a side of the story, which has been covered up by an excellent (I must say, ironically) propaganda orchestrated in many years by several Serbian regimes, where Albanians are represented as wild, always causing wars, illiterate, ugly looking, (once horribly even heard that Albanians allegedly had tails), making racial comments, the Muslims of the Europe (the tie with Al-Qaeda or whatever) i.e. threat to Christian Europe, and many many more things, which are ridiculous to mention. The world does not hate Serbs, they just understood the truth finally, and were slow at doing that, unfortunately, after many lives of innocents were lost. ilir_pz 19:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The real problem beetwen the Serbs and Albanians

The real problem beetwen the Serbs and Albanians is not Kosovo this must be clear. But the Serbian propagander is traing to make that als proble. The reale problem betwen Kosovo and Serbia are Sandjak and Kosovos teritory in Serbia. But the serbians users are traing to make Kosovo site as problem. See the problems in Serbia about witch the Serbian users are not talking abou thate [1] and tomorow they are going to say this was the Serbian land. Sandjak and Toplica was never till after the Ottomans hase lost control in this area a Serbian land. You are thinkin thate if you send soume settlers in one area and build a Church, you are going to keep this area for your land? For some time yes but not forever beacose the real mane is going to commeback. All this area Serbia hase taket with propagander and during this time the albanians make war agains the Ottomans.

In this page I m working to finde out how many seattlers was seatet in Kosovo. All the data are comming from Serbian source. Till now I have preparet for Wiki only the number of the family for one city, in near future Im going to put the data about the land witch it was taket from albanians and gived to the serbian. I have the documentation for Toplica and Sandjak. how many family was killed and how many seatlers was comming there. Upps only in city Gjakovë there was send from Serbia more than 2000 serbian family.!!!! For the Soluna (Serbians from the Thesaloniki front-line) witch hase seatlet in Toplica I need more time beacose the Belgrader corruptied wount more mony for this document.