User talk:Giddyupp

Welcome!

Hi Giddyupp! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BRD

You Boldly changed the lead at Colony Ridge, Texas, but your edit was Reverted, so your next step (especially since there is already an open discussion on the matter) is to Discuss the matter at Talk:Colony Ridge, Texas. (See WP:BRD.) The lack of neutrality arises is using language from the very start of the article that paints Colony Ridge in a poor light. The facts are not wrong, per se, but by placing them so prominently in the article, without balance, you give these facts undue weight. You state that They market in Spanish with ads without evidence that they do not also market in English. You are also relying on unreliable YouTube videos as your source. To be sure, the Justice Department has opened investigations into their activities, and that is mentioned in the article, but, again, placing that material prominently in the lead gives it undue weight. I urge you to enter the discussion at Talk:Colony Ridge, Texas. And I assure you, I have no connection to Colony Ridge and gain no financial gain one way or the other. To insinuate anything else fails to assume good faith. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Texasfirsttoo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Texasfirsttoo. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 05:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]