User talk:Gillespio

Dear Gillispio, Welcome to Wikipedia. Since you created your account 3 days ago it appears you have focused on articles concerning In Jin Moon and her relatives. I see that you have been adding defamatory text[1][2] without any sources, to the article In Jin Moon and reverting other editors when the content is removed.[3] I have today removed the text once again. Please read the policy WP:BLP which says "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing." If you place the offensive content back in the article again, there will be no choice but to see a blockage of your account. I hope that this is just a misunderstanding and that you will correct your behavior and go on to become a worthwhile contributor to Wikipedia. Best,-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:08, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The URL's you have provided on the talk page are not valid sources per Wikipedia's policies. Please read WP:BLOGS.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:24, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks like this "KEITHBOB AND BOROCK are Moonies, that erase information that is verifiable on page Tongil Foundation (moon cult")[4] are not permitted per WP:NPA.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:24, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your editing behavior is now being discussed at the Administrators Noticeboard. You may participate by clicking here.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. – Connormah (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Connormah (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at In Jin Moon. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that if you continue to add the unsourced and contentious information back in the article when your block expires, your next block is likely to be indefinite.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]