User talk:Gladrius

This user may have left Wikipedia. Gladrius has not edited Wikipedia since February 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Gladrius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AndyZ 22:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Mickey's Space Adventure

Hello, good work on Mickey's Space Adventure, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you list in the article any websites, books, or other sources that will allow people to verify the content in Mickey's Space Adventure? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET for different citation methods. Thanks! BRIAN0918 13:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mazinger

Hi I've noticed you are one of the users that usually contributes to mazinger pages. What else you think could be done to improve them, like the navigation box or the articles? Thank you --Mikaine 15:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, another person who's played Labyrinth of Time?!

I thought there were only four of us. XD Anyhoo, thanks for fixing up the mistakes I made in the article. I hadn't played the game for a while (and it was my first article on Wikipedia, so there were a ton of inaccuracies/mistakes. ShadowMan1od 23:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Chee3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chee3.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

Mazinger 2

Hi! sorry for not answering before, I didn't even notice your message - I still don't quite understand some wiki stuff. Unfortunately, I'm not into GM as much as MZ, so my knowledge is a bit limited in some areas. User Max Thayer is starting a Duke Fleed article and asked me if he qualified as a Mazinger character. I think he does, I've never included any of the Grendizer characters because I know very little about them. What do you think? Thank you!--Mikaine 00:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Ace Lightning, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Please note that any major content changes, which includes rewrites that add or remove content should never be considered a minor change and should not be checked as such. Collectonian (talk) 21:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chee3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chee3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Undeath (talk) 17:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kamen Rider ZO

The article Kamen Rider ZO has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This film fails Wikipedia's general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 21:09, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kamen Rider ZO for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamen Rider ZO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider ZO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix (talk) 22:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canadianman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadianman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadianman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cheetahmen2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cheetahmen2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Champions (Hero Universe)

The article The Champions (Hero Universe) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doctor Destroyer

The article Doctor Destroyer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]