User talk:Gmfreeman619

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gmfreeman619 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never abused any policies on this account. It may be someone else at my work, but my account has never been used for misconduct.

Decline reason:

One request at a time please. Increasing these templates does not hasten our review. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:50, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gmfreeman619 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not affiliate with any of the other accounts listed. My name is Andrew Streetlight and I am 27 years old. I work at Cummins in Columbus, Indiana.Can you not be an immature chump and respond to my requests? Thank you *drops mic* .

Decline reason:

Discussed with checkuser, who seconded the original block's validity per multiple reviews of your account data. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser review

{{checkuser needed}} as administrators must not loosen or remove this block without consulting a CheckUser^{(CU block}} due to the confidential nature of the data that led to this block. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffee: I don't understand the request. The block was not a checkuser block. It was a block by a checkuser, which is not the same thing. Second, what do you mean by "the confidential nature of the data that led to this block"? Finally, why are you even asking for a check? Is there some reason you feel the user should be unblocked? Several CheckUsers have already checked this account, including Jpgordon, the blocking administrator. For these reasons, the request is

Declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: I had no way of knowing the account had been checked by multiple checkusers. I was merely asking for someone to do exactly what you did: clarify the block for me. I assumed the block happened in result of checkuser data, which is the point of the "confidential nature" term. I don't know of any other way to ping you all, since there isn't a checkuser unblock type template/ping checkuser template that I'm aware of. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffee: No big deal. Thanks for clarifying. I think the simplest thing to do in the future would be to talk to the CheckUser who imposed the block, in this instance Jpgordon. If you look at his Talk page, you'll see that someone already asked him about this block.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I still haven't done anything wrong. I would like you to review the block.:::@Coffee:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gmfreeman619 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

This unblock request is empty. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.