User talk:Go Phightins!/ACE2014

I await further answers to my questions - each question I grade on a scale of zero to three with the midpoint being a "Gentleman's C" at best - I suspect some may defer answering, though I think the questions are well-aimed at getting the candidates general viewpoints about the committee in focus (I find pointed questions aimed at a single candidate to be distasteful). Cheers. Collect (talk) 22:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

scored

4, 5 and 7 are now scored on my ACE page - feel free to use as wished. Cheers. Collect (talk) 22:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Collect. Because your questions were thorough, I did not feel a need to add more of my own. I will take your scores under advisement when making mine. Go Phightins! 04:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Clarification from Stanistani

"Adequate statement, but this concerns me: "I pledge to fully comply with the Wikimedia Foundation's criteria for access to non-public data, including not disclosing any such information I gain to Wikipediocracy (I do add a caveat that there are likely to be members of ARBCOM who are also members of Wikipediocracy. Discussions of ARBCOM confidential business by me will not be on Wikipediocracy, but on ARBCOM channels if I am elected.)." The implication that there would not inherently be unequivocal compliance is a little disconcerting."

I'd like to clarify my position. I will unequivocally comply with the Wikimedia Foundation's criteria for access to public data. My caveat was just to point out that there are and will be members of ARBCOM who will be also members of Wikipediocracy, so naturally anything I say to such members (on the ARBCOM mailing list for example) has been disclosed to a member of Wikipediocracy. I further pledged that "Discussions of ARBCOM confidential business by me will not be on Wikipediocracy, but on ARBCOM channels if I am elected."

That is the opposite of what you're implying. Please change your statement.→StaniStani 06:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have amended my comments and score. Thank you for the clarification, and I offer my apologies if my misreading hurt your candidacy in any way. All the best. Go Phightins! 13:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction. I doubt there was any harm. The dice fall where they may.→StaniStani 13:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Timing

Unfortunately, real life has not been as conducive to writing this guide as I had hoped, and I may not have the opportunity to post the results of my research in as detailed form for the remaining candidates. In the event that I do not, I am leaning weak support on Hahc and Ks0stm, weak oppose on Kraxler, no opinion on Thryduulf, and support for Salvio and Yunshui. Sorry for not having time to post more detail. Go Phightins! 16:15, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]