User talk:Gomu gomu no pistol

Recent edit to Topshop

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions and remember that Wikipedia does include honorifics. Thank you! Luxure (talk) 08:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Misconceptions2 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal

You should apepal this unblock. I think you have been blocked very harshly. Just so you know, you are being accused of being the user Misconceptions2. To appeal write "{{unblock | reason here}" . Please appeal unless you really are misconceptions2--Calcula2 (talk) 16:08, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have been using multiple IP, but only because in my country ip address keeps changing. Please understand !--Gomu gomu no pistol (talk) 16:29, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gomu gomu no pistol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been using multiple IP, but only because in my country ip address keeps changing. Please understand ! I do not know Misconceptions2

Decline reason:

Your unblock reason is entirely unconvincing. From my perspective, this account is almost certainly a puppet account. PhilKnight (talk) 22:16, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Who mentioned IP address? You created this account and made only two edits, then re-appeared weeks later to do a bulk revert along M2's WP:OWN obsession. Two episodes of editing, both within a couple of minutes. If you needed more than two IPs to achieve this, there's something seriously unstable with your router! Andy Dingley (talk) 17:09, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your first several edits make it clear that you aren't a new user...and your actions also make it clear that you are a meatpuppet.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What happened here is an injustice and it should not set a precedent. Theres basically no evidence what so ever this user is a sock, other than he edited 1 article M2 edited. The blocking admins justification is laughable, he claims this user likes "anime" and that M2 also likes anime, and therefore they are same people???? WHAT IS THIS CRAP???? For Gods sake the checkuser is inconclusive--Mohsinmallik (talk) 18:26, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess you just conveniently ignore all those reverts he did then? The anime AND weapons coincidence is just one tell and I never said they were the same people. Quoting one checkuser from the archive on this case, "Checkuser only proves coincidence, and lack of coincidence proves nothing". In the current CU finding of this case, the checkuser actually suggested WP:MEAT after running the check.
  — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]