User talk:Goyambab

Test

Hi Goyambab Rane he. Goyambab (talk) 05:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sign

Goyambab (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reference format for journal

{{cite journal}}: Empty citation (help) Goyambab (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Goyambab! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 10:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ekdalian (talk) 10:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Joshi punekar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joshi punekar. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23Thank you for providing unblock tag. Goyambab (talk) 17:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My genuine and only one account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goyambab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear administrator, This is only one account of mine and I don’t have any alternative account till date.I request you to view my contributions and behaviour from the date of joining.Even if it is 20 edits I have done research from Oxford university publications.I respect your suspicion as sockpuppetry as the main problem of Wikipedia is sock(Even I have observed many such cases in the same page) with the due respect to administrators I want to confirm that I am not sock.I request you to see the details once again.My expertise is good in konkan coast history.I can contribute in a very good manner if you consider me. Regards, Goembabji Rane Goyambab (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fine time to say good bye

Dear @PhilKnight,

This would have not been a possibility as I didn’t used Wikipedia before this.Even my Gated community WI-FI is secure.Anyhow seems like i don’t have luck to contribute towards Wikipedia.

Cheers and Signing out, Goembabji Rane. Goyambab (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]