User talk:Grand Cohen

Lol

You think you can censor Norman Davies, the most respected Polish historian? Think again, your tribal affiliation means nothing here. Kurcyusz (talk) 07:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are using bullshit Polish sources, stop. Grand Cohen (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. // Timothy :: talk 15:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grand Cohen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I registered to remove antisemitic content from Holocaust studies, sourced to right wing sources, where the field was being described as being founded as part of a conspiracy by the Israeli embassy in London. This antisemitic description is wrong on many levels. I described my objections to this antismeitic content on the article's talk page: [1][2][3]. How is that I am blocked? Removing antisemtic conspiracies, vandalism really, is something you should be encouraging! Grand Cohen (talk) 08:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You edit warred to preserve your preferred version of an article, and are using uncivil language like "bullshit Polish sources" and "crap sources and bullshit" and "antisemetic crap". You seem to have a singular purpose here; I'm in agreement with the blocking admin. You will need to adopt a more collaborative and civil attitude in order to be unblocked, and explain how you will handle a content dispute without edit warring. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that this decline is not an endorsement of any particular article content- you must address any content dispute in the proper way. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]