User talk:Greenwave37

Welcome!

Hello, Greenwave37, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Trading Room.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Trading Room.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have added the license. Greenwave37 (talk) 21:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:GW II - Tulane University.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GW II - Tulane University.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have added the license. Greenwave37 (talk) 21:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sports Lawyers Journal

The article Sports Lawyers Journal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG: Unable to identify any independent, reliable sources in any language offering more than a trivial mention.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 20:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sports Lawyers Journal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sports Lawyers Journal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports Lawyers Journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —swpb^T 13:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]