User talk:Gubatronix

Welcome!

Hello, Gubatronix, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of diplomatic missions in Israel did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Schazjmd (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand how the information added is ureliable as there is video proof of the edit i have made all over may social media platforms. Gubatronix (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

many* Gubatronix (talk) 23:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also the State of Israel is an internationally condemned entity for know atrocities and its human rights violations in the practiced apartheid and killings aimed at palestinians and arab muslims in general Gubatronix (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cite your sources for content that you add to articles. They must be reliable sources (see WP:RS). Social media doesn't count. Schazjmd (talk) 23:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why cant i post links in a talk? Gubatronix (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nevermind Gubatronix (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/11/14/gaza-unlawful-israeli-hospital-strikes-worsen-health-crisis Gubatronix (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Striking a hospital is strictly against international law

https://www.icrc.org/en/document/protection-hospitals-during-armed-conflicts-what-law-says#:~:text=According%20to%20international%20humanitarian%20law,staff%20and%20means%20of%20transport. Gubatronix (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The content that you added was Israel is not recognized by all states of the world because of its military occupation of the palestinian territories and genocidal acts in those territories. You need a reliable source that supports that all of the countries (28 UN member states) that don't recognize Israel do not do so because of " its military occupation of the palestinian territories and genocidal acts in those territories." Schazjmd (talk) 00:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand Gubatronix (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But if i wanted to add the information to the "Israel"-Hamas war it wolud be impossible as it is blocked to protect "Israel's" public image, which to me seems unfair Gubatronix (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to leave a notice below this comment. Ignore the first sentence, as you haven't edited such an article, but please read the remainder of the notice carefully before making any more edits. Schazjmd (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand Gubatronix (talk) 00:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, have a great day or a good night depending on where you are

Cheers Gubatronix (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Schazjmd (talk) 00:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at The Human Boundaries, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. When you remove a cited source from an article, please explain why in your edit summary. Schazjmd (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]