User talk:Guda4siempre

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Guda4siempre, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to UEFA Champions League clubs performance comparison seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 22:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Red Devil, User:Jopal22, what do you make of all this? As an admin, I need to work with what others say and report. Drmies (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, Unfortunately this user has unilaterally decided to change the colour palette for these articles, and continually implemented this change even when reversed. They are currently doing this outside of this account. They have not used the talk page to discuss if though asked. This colour palette is common across multiple articles and has been produced talking into account colour blindness (although I cannot find the discussion regarding this). Jopal22 (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at UEFA Champions League clubs performance comparison. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your "The colors I replaced show neither a clear distinction between a successful and unsuccessful campaign nor the proximity to success", and I raise you MOS:COLOR. Your edit summaries are way too verbose, and your figurative use of color to indicate progress is...well, it's your choice. You can read the guideline or not, and if I were you I'd scroll all the way to the top and read the beginning also. Making our web pages accessible to all readers, visually impaired or not, is not optional. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Show me specifically what I'm violating about MOS:COLOR.

2. My figurative use of color to indicate progress is not my choice. Learn about data visualization. A sequential palette of colors is best to visualize progress, and to my understanding, a sequential palette of colors is not a violation of MOS:COLOR.

3. You are confused and not understanding my goal. This is not for the visually impaired. This is about conveying information.

Please consider the change. I'm trying to make this page better. Guda4siempre (talk) 01:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that you also think a precipitation table violates MOS:COLOR, right? Or am I misunderstanding your accusation?

Climate of Georgia (U.S. state)#:~:text=Precipitation,-Average annual precipitation&text=The entire state, including the,Northeast part of the state.

Don't be close minded. If the sequence of colors I chose violates MOS:COLOR, at least tell me specifically what I'm violating, so that I can make it better, otherwise, I would think that you are simply being dismissive of my changes without any valid justification. Guda4siempre (talk) 02:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]