User talk:HJafri

Welcome!

Hello, HJafri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Nahal^(T) 06:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Centaurus, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs and commercial websites

Hello HJafri, thank you for your efforts to improve Pakistan-related articles. But please make sure to read WP:RS regarding Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources. Blogs, forums and similar self-published content are usually not considered reliable sources (more details at WP:SPS). Commercial PR websites, while not completely prohibited, are discouraged in favor of independent non-promotional sources - Wikipedia isn't supposed to promote other websites or businesses. If independent reliable sources have reported about them, such details can be included in relevant context of course. I have reverted some of your recent good-faith edits due to these issues. Please feel free to ask me on my talkpage if you have any further questions. WP:Teahouse is also a good forum to post for advice about any Wikipedia-related question. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 08:11, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas (Dental Surgeon) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas (Dental Surgeon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas (Dental Surgeon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 14:57, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]