User talk:HJensen/Archives/2009/February

TE is doing it again

Check this. It seems he ignores also your warning about WP:EGG —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.57.9.59 (talk) 22:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!

Even Rubin and Cole say Tennis expert has lost it. Ohconfucius (talk) 13:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I will look at it, but explicitly state here that I otherwise do nothing incivil. And I emphasize that if this is a diff somewhere, this is not a tag-team effort. It is not. Really. It is not. So this is a bad diff, posted by an editor with too much time oh his/her hands.--HJensen, talk 14:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

• I regret your being driven to paranoia. I can agree that anal obsession of someone scouring the earth for diffs to demonstrate some sort of conspiracy against him, can be unsettling. My post was only for your information, and does not imply endorsement or otherwise of my concern for this persons well-being. However, as if to confirm your worst fears, my post has been extracted once again as 'evidence', against me. Ohconfucius (talk) 09:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Oh boy! This is sick. (And this silly stuff doesn't make me really paranoid; just tired and depressed for the future of the world we live in :-) .) Thanks for your message. Over and out (and if this is a diff, it is a BAD diff. A SILLY diff. A diff that shows the DIFF POSTER doesn't have a life. BAD diff!!).--HJensen, talk 10:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking

Please see the above arbitration case where you have been named in a proposal in the workshop. Regards, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 13:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I know of it, and do not want to participate anymore. It has turned into a Kindergarden activity for a few very stubborn and self-righteous people. I don't want to waste more time on these children pretending to be serious adults.--HJensen, talk 17:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• I appreciated your comment on WT:Date delinking/Workshop. I also really liked your above response. You and I think very much alike. BTW, I too like am an adult, am a male (anatomically at birth and I’m not going to apologize for it), am a father, enjoy the Simpsons (but love Family Guy), appreciate Futurama, am a professional procrastinator (comes from perfectionism in some cases, which I suspect applies in your case), and Thinks 2001 is an awesome bit of work. I think 2001 was the greatest film accomplishment of all time. Rimisherim (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your friendly message. Cheers!--HJensen, talk 13:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:2006zpzposter.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:2006zpzposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 25 February 2009 (UTC)