User talk:Habs2023

January 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, why are you blocking me? I have reverted all my changes and I am waiting for the user WMrapids to response about the changes. I find fully unfair that you just decided to block me despite not agreeing to have a fair debate as per Wikipedia guidelines. Habs2023 (talk) 23:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already mentioned that there was not a single source stating that this was a Massacre, yet, WMrapids which has his own political motivated reasons and doesn't want to debate the changes. Please consider that we are looking for facts not assumptions. Habs2023 (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot create accounts or edit via IP while there is a current block in place. You created and used this account despite already being blocked. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:56, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true. I have not use multiple IPs, I created this account and agree to do the changes once there is a debate. If I would have like to change the article without debate, I Could have use a VPN yet, I am waiting for WMrapids. The USER WMrapids doesn't want to do that debate and the article shows not factual information. I want to raise an appeal for blocking my account for no reason. Habs2023 (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will also raise a complain against you here in Switzerland is sad to see how many of you are political motivated and not agreeing to have a fair debate. This is not over ;) Habs2023 (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that legal threats are not permitted here. See WP:NLT. More accurately, you are free to edit Wikipedia (when not blocked) and you are free to take advantage of the legal system, but can't do both. If you wish to pursue legal action, you will not be permitted to edit Wikipedia until that legal action is complete, or until you unconditionally withdraw your threat of legal action. --Yamla (talk) 12:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I just wanted to bring clarity into the the area, yet WMRapids doesn't even want to discuss nor debate about the topic and the article is a clear violation of factual content and defamation. You can keep the ban as long as you like, I already have your IPs and will start the proceedings here in Switzerland. Thanks, Habs2023 (talk) 23:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And funny wise, WMRapids removed all the debates that I started. Its clear that Wikipedia does not longer protect freedom of speech. We are happy the chatgpt will take over all you guys. Time for a change. Bye Habs2023 (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true. I have not use multiple IPs, I created this account and agree to do the changes once there is a debate. If I would have like to change the article without debate, I Could have use a VPN yet, I am waiting for WMrapids. The USER WMrapids doesn't want to do that debate and the article shows not factual information. I want to raise an appeal for blocking my account for no reason. Habs2023 (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Habs2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Habs2023 (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Habs2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am being unfairly blocked despite agreeing to wait for WMRapids to answer about the article. Habs2023 (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have investigated this block and Confirmed it is appropriate, as Ponyo described above. Yamla (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion and legal threats. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]