User talk:Hammerby
|
Hi. I like the table you added to Children of Men. As a new editor, you may not be aware of the attribution policy that I linked to in the header above. It might be best to move your edits to either the talk or temp page, so that we can merge them into the article with sources. I would like to see the content in the theme section, but we need reliable sources. I may be able to source some of them, and we may be able to use the official script as a descriptive, primary source. Let me know. —Viriditas | Talk 00:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- However, the script is not an citable source, as it doesn't accurately describe events as they transpire in the film.Arcayne 04:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- The primary source, an official release script off of the official website, can be used for descriptive purposes per policy. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction). I have just gathered half of the quotes from RS, so it will be easy to see any major differences. It is your opinion that the official shooting script is inaccurate. Referring to the film within a film from the script in a descriptive manner is perfectly acceptable according to policy. On the other hand, interpretations of a fictional story must use secondary sources. —Viriditas | Talk 06:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for getting back to me. If you have the URL for the official page where you downloaded the propaganda film, we may be able to salvage some things. I'm going to copy the official script below so you can report back with any differences from the official film you watched online. Then, I would suggest looking for secondary sources to back up other observations:
A state propaganda loop showing a images of worldwide destruction... "PARIS" -- the battered Eiffel Tower surrounded by ruins. "MOSCOW" -- the Kremlin standing, dead bodies on the streets. "PHILADELPHIA" -- army fighting heavily armed militias, Liberty bell in the b.g. "MADRID" -- 1500 men hung in the Plaza del Sol. "KUALA LUMPUR" -- only one Petronas Tower standing. "THE WORLD IS FALLING APART..." The images of destruction accelerating until... BONG! The montage ends on Big Ben, still ticking, the Holst March rising. Title: "ONLY BRITAIN SOLDIERS ON."
—Viriditas | Talk 19:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link to the official site. You could easily describe the film using the script and the website, but any interpretations of the images require secondary sources. Are you able to find written descriptions or interpretations of the propaganda film on the official website? I will help you find sources by adding them to the section on the article talk page. —Viriditas | Talk 00:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I think we can salvage much of what you've written with good secondary sources. I encourage you to remain hopeful. First, do you have any objections to converting the table into prose? It might make it easier for other editors to work with it and accept it. Second, I will be looking for sources and adding them to the temp page as I find them. I suggest we work on it there. —Viriditas | Talk 08:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link to the official site. You could easily describe the film using the script and the website, but any interpretations of the images require secondary sources. Are you able to find written descriptions or interpretations of the propaganda film on the official website? I will help you find sources by adding them to the section on the article talk page. —Viriditas | Talk 00:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Hoax
[edit]As a rule, we don't put discussions of such hoaxes in articles ... it simply encourages their repetition.Kww (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Hammerby. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Hammerby. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Hammerby. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)