User talk:Hasanzaidi23

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Hasanzaidi23/Jai Menon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: User:Hasanzaidi23/Jai Menon was moved to Jai Prakash Menon by Hasanzaidi23 (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2010-01-31T18:17:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Template:New unreviewed article. Blank pages are malicious to Wikipedia as they often confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the deletion process for how to proceed. Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 06:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jai Prakash Menon

The article Jai Prakash Menon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This unsourced, unverified, and wiki-unlinked article reads like a resume (of a relatively obscure) person, not remotely like Wikipedia bio. I'm not from his country so I can't even begin to investigate the genuine notability of the person. But on Wikipedia the onus is on the editors to provide proof. The article has had "multiple issues" hatnote at the top that has been there for 5 years. It seems like more than enough time has long passed to verify and add reliable sources. Therefore it's not even worth sanitizing the "resume-like" paragraphs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Loginnigol (talk) 18:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)