Jump to content

User talk:Hawns

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for Image:Mixtape cvr.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mixtape cvr.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Love is a Mix Tape

[edit]

The article Love is a Mix Tape has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of importance of this book. There should be a CSD for this type of stuff

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Dissident Aggressor 21:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Love Is a Mix Tape has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article was created in 2006 by an WP:SPA. The Publishers Summary section is huge – bigger than the rest of the stub (don't be fooled – it's inside small tags). The article's author claims (at Talk:Love Is a Mix Tape) that we have permission to use it, but there is no ticket number or other details. The publisher's site and an LA Times article are the only two proper refs. There are potential refs in the form of ELs in the Press and Reviews section, but nobody has seen fit to expand the article using them in 14 years. Delete the quote and copyvio-revdel, or just delete this skeleton?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 10:23, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]