User talk:Heliumsingh5000

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-600px-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Heliumsingh5000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 14:05, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Algoworks may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in 2009. By 2009 Algoworks was also providing Mobile and Cloud development services, and became [[IBM Red Hat Partner in 2010 and certified Salesforce Partner in 2013. Algoworks employs more than

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Algoworks logo 2014.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Algoworks logo 2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LambdaTest

Why did you edit MER-C's archived message here? Why are you so eager to have LambdaTest appear in search engines? Do you have a connection with the subject? Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. This is an obvious covert advertising (UPE) account, and has been blocked as such. MER-C 18:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 18:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heliumsingh5000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi whoever reviewing this. I am not sure why the account was suspended. The last post has been flagged as covert advertising however I took all care not to come out as such. In addition my account was flagged as an account that has spamming as "only purpose" but if you check my contributions I have never spammed. I have edited few grammatical errors, worked on a google page and bootstrap page and worked on LambdaTest page after around 4 years as a minor project. I am betting that my simple page on LambdaTest is the point of contention so I am going to give a little more context. I am a webdeveloper by profession and come across tools such as LambdaTest everyday. I found this tool on chrome extension and on research found no wiki page for this. As a simple side project, because I was free and was using LambdaTest for a client, i decided to create a page for it. I took care of only citing reliable web news sources (crunchbase, Mint, economics times, techgig) and made the post as neutral as possible. I used BrowserStack and Sauce Labs as templates, and considering that these pages cited same sources (crunchbase, itcentral, etc) I thought that these sources are legit. The next issue that comes was that I added index tag. I searched the post on google and didn't find it. So on further research I found that you have to manually add the index tag so I did. With that said, if you think the post is not valid, feel free to delete it however the suspension of the whole account on the basis of one very legitimately written post is not fair in my opinion. Let me know what could have been done better.Helium -- The inert (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That still doesn't explain why you edited an archived discussion. New articles on Wikipedia are not indexed by search engines until they are vetted by new page patrol. Attempting to manually bypass this – which does not work, by the way – is something that an SEO-minded spammer would do. Per our terms of use, you must disclose whether you've been paid to edit Wikipedia. Please keep this in mind if you make another unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heliumsingh5000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks NinjaRobotPirate for considering my unblock request. Considering your advice I wish to disclose here I am not working for LambdaTest nor am I getting paid for creating the wikipedia page for LambdaTest. I created it just as a simple side project because I was using LambdaTest for a client project. I removed the link from conflict of interest page because I thought there was not conflict of interest. For the next point related to indexing, I want to clarify again here that I get no benefit from Getting the page indexed or am I working for SEO of LambdaTest. Nearly a week after creating the page I was boasting to a friend about it but on googling didn't found the page. On further research i came across this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words and thought that it was standard practice to use index magicword "index". I was not aware of the 90 day rule or patrolling as suggest in the post new page patrol. With that said again, if you feel the page created is not of good quality, I am ok with it being deleted or put in Draft state indefinitely as it is now. Let me know if clarification is needed on something more.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline due to lack of response after 8 days to GoldenRing's questions below. Please add a new unblock template with a reply to GoldenRing's questions if you wish to be further considered for unblocking. Uninvited Company 21:56, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your editing history is very sporadic, with most of it focused on commercial software development products. If you were unblocked, do you intend to edit actively? What topics would you be likely to edit? GoldenRing (talk) 10:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Google Chrome Experiments

The article Google Chrome Experiments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NWEB or WP:GNG. Overwhelming majority of the article content was contributed by Heliumsingh5000 who has been banned as "Spam / advertising-only account".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]