User talk:Helpfulweasal

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Zoning

Wikipedia:Zoning, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Zoning and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Zoning during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. roux 06:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Don't delete the deletion tempalates

Wikipedia:Don't delete the deletion tempalates, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't delete the deletion tempalates and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Don't delete the deletion tempalates during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. roux 07:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Don't delete the deletion tempalates

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Don't delete the deletion tempalates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Wikipedia:Don't delete the deletion tempalates|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Wikipedia:EPICFAIL

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:EPICFAIL, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wikipedia:EPICFAIL is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wikipedia:EPICFAIL, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Wikipedia:WTFIMAGE

I have nominated Wikipedia:WTFIMAGE (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]