User talk:Heltzen/Archive index/prebot

G'day !

Welcome to the WP:TORIG, I hope you become active as soon as you settle in the Wikienvironment Daoken 10:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello & thank you

Thank you very much for the compliment. At a brief glance that looks like the sort of thing I would be happy to put my name to - I have been pushing for verifiability and been finding quite a few errors in corporate history (which you may have noticed is a bit of a favourite of mine). As for the template on Airbus, I hope you realise that talk page comment was good humoured? I'm busy for the next few days but will certainly try to improve it when I can, or failing that when I've more time. The recent history is quite well cited, it's the early history that needs work. Thanks again & best regards. Mark83 21:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TORIG is now WP:TIMETRACE

WikiProject True Origins WP:TORIG is now WikiProject Timeline Tracer WP:TIMETRACE also WP:TIMET. This follows many opinions that the previous name of the project could confuse or provide negative feelings in some users. Daoken 02:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TIMETRACE has been enhanced, give a look

WikiProject Timeline Tracer has been greatly enhanced with Guidelines and Strategy as well as many alternatives which will make your editions more easy to target, easier to tag or comment and much more. Please go to WP:TIMETRACE, give a look in the new tools and get busy helping articles. Remember that this WikiProject is helping the backbone (beyond content) of all articles , Reliable Sources and Verification. Thank you for participating Daoken 11:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for the barnstar. That was very thoughtful of you. Jakew 09:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:TTStarAchievement.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:TTStarAchievment.jpg. The copy called Image:TTStarAchievment.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 11:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Aviator.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Aviator.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Removed nonsense

There was some nonsense from a user here, mistaken identity I guess, see history if you feel for digging Heltzen ◩ 15:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The so called Calton, today called ZZuuzz has blocked me, I guess he didn't like I called "nonsense" our exchange from yesterday, I will see how to unblock from the guy Heltzen ◩ 08:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Airbus

Thanks for the "good work" edit summary! Yes, it's looking better. From the referencing I did I noticed there's quite a bit of history missing (post formation - late 90s). I intend to work on the too. Mark83 14:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TIMETRACE

Hello, I wonder if you could, while editing diverse articles, check if they have sources in their history or chronology (or when they mention any important date. If they don't, could you please place inline {{Timefact}} calls where those citations to sources are missing, this will display ^{[chronology citation needed]}. If you find an article with too many inline calls to place or totally lacking needed history of the subject, you can instead place {{histrefm}} at the footnotes of the article's main page, just before Categories. If you could add this to your routines, it will most certainly help WP:TIMETRACE. Thank you for your help. Daoken 06:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]