User talk:Hi Im Random

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Hi Im Random, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: User talk:Hi Im Random was moved to Talk:Hi Im Random by Hi Im Random (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2010-04-30T19:51:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

{{helpme}} How do I get a list of those "about me things" for example:

AWW
DMBJ
AWGC
AWAI
FDSP
BATD
MTAD

This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists.

WP:USERBOX - however, please note, Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Cheers, Chzz ► 19:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for treating Wikipedia as a social-networking site (see this for more detail). If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

—Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Dittobori)} 20:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe some education and friendliness is in order before an indef? Beach drifter (talk) 02:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hi Im Random (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was about to start a new Wikipedia Article about bear hunting

Decline reason:

Wikipedia already has an article about Bear hunting. You were blocked because you appeared to be using Wikipedia as a place to play, and didn't give any evidence that you were interested in helping to write an encyclopedia, or that you had the skills to do so. If you want to be unblocked, it would be a good idea to read some of the information available through Wikipedia:Introduction. Think about whether you want to help write a good encyclopedia, and what you think you could do that would be useful- then request unblock again, when you have a better understanding of what Wikipedia is. If you decide, after a little more reading, that Wikipedia isn't for you, that's okay, too. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.