User talk:History2008

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Unfortunately some of the pages you edited have collected a bunch of inappropriate links, which might give the impression that wikipedia is a collection of links, which it is not. Hope the above references help make it clearer. Zodon (talk) 18:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kelly,

The endorsement from Voting4Life.org would be an appropriate and helpful link. I don’t think prominent Pro-Life sites are overly concerned with Wikipedia effects on page ranking, notwithstanding that external links not altering search engine rankings in Wikipedia has been a given for a long time.

“Unfortunately some of the pages you edited have collected a bunch of inappropriate links” – You are referring to links substantiating that the 1962 Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani document was drafted to cover-up pedophile Priests and excommunicate child victims, most people would not consider that inappropriate.

History2008 (talk) 04:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. BJ^Talk 05:19, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. MBisanz ^talk 06:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-Life sites have a lot of links to each other. It is very clear that Sarah Palin would want endorsements from Pro-Life Catholics groups, and would certainly be aware of the Catholic vote. Voting4Life is a prominent Catholic site affiliated with: http://www.advancedchristianity.com/, http://www.catholic-voter.com/, http://www.freewebs.com/prolifewebring/index.htm, http://www.nrlc.org/, http://prolifecatholic.angelfire.com/, http://www.thereoughttobealaw.net/, etc. History2008 (talk) 06:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And it is not our concern. Block still active. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]