User talk:Hmoss

Revenuegateway

A tag has been placed on Revenuegateway, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why Revenuegateway is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Revenuegateway. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Fan-1967 17:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Has EuroRevenue been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works? Are there sources for the content in the article other than the company's own website/publications? -- Steel 14:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I was looking for. Feel free to re-upload the logo (just remember to provide a link to a page it's on, the company's website will do) and move it back to the original location. Ideally each individual point in the article should have a source, and it's still full of technical jargon and irrelevant information ("Each affiliate partner is assigned a unique descriptor, which allows the company to accurately track traffic sources and pay commissions to the referring webmaster for individual sales", for example) which ought to be removed. The vast majority of company articles are very short (EACA, for example) and to be honest that's all that EuroRevenue's article is likely to end up as. -- Steel 01:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Erlogosmall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Erlogosmall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EuroRevenue

The site must have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial works from subjects that are themselves notable, reliable, and independent of the subject. Articles lacking those can be deleted based on non-notability. ♠P M C♠ 21:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The last one doesn't qualify, since EuroRevenue is only briefly mentioned as the sponsor, and isn't the main focus of the article. On the other hand, you're right about the rest, and I apologize. I do think the article needs to be re-written somewhat. It feels very bare-bones at present, mainly talking about their business practices and content policies, and how they help other adult sites make money. That makes it feel rather ad-like, at least to me. It lacks background information such as: when was it founded? Where? By whom? Is there a clever story behind the company forming? Who runs the show now? etc, etc. How about this: I'll re-post the content of the last deleted version on a subpage of yours (at User:Hmoss/EuroRevenue, for example). This allows you to edit the article as you please, without a risk of it being speedy deleted again. When you're ready, and the article's been fleshed out some more, we can move it back out to the mainspace at EuroRevenue. Sound okay? ♠P M C♠ 17:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Er-logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Er-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Revenuegatewaylogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Revenuegatewaylogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]