User talk:Hness002

Welcome!

Hello, Hness002, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sports psychiatry

The article Sports psychiatry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Any relevant and encyclopedic information can be included in our article on psychiatry. Sports psychology is a thing, sport psychiatry is just psychiatry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Praxidicae (talk) 14:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft and deletion tag

Hi - with the deletion tag, the best thing to do would be to continue to improve the article and show how sports psychiatry is independently notable outside of the main topic of psychiatry. I've added some sourcing in the further reading section that could be helpful.

I also had some notes on your draft:

• IMDb is not usable as a reliable source on Wikipedia because anyone can edit the site and IMDb isn't the greatest about actually verifying claims. Also, the ratings aren't usable either, as anyone can submit a rating. The only times that these sort of ratings get added to an article is when they get coverage in the media, as was the case with the film Saving Christmas (lowest rated movie on IMDb) or Bend, Not Break (one star review bombed on Amazon).

• The cast/characters section should be fairly brief, pretty much just a list of names for the most part. Any information that is pertinent to the film should be mixed into the synopsis section, however keep in mind that this should only be a general overview.

• The article should only contain information that is directly pertinent to the film. For example, in the production section you have information about the other films that the production company has created, information about the company's creation, and who is involved with the company. This isn't really important as far as the short film goes, since none of that is directly relevant to the short film. It's assumed that the production company will have worked on other films and have involvement with notable persons, so unless they worked on the short film directly and there is coverage of this in reliable sources, there's no need to mention any of this.

• Be careful of tone, as some of this takes more of a favorable view towards the short film in places.

I'm concerned that there isn't any coverage in independent and reliable sources. All of the sources are primary and one is a Linkedin page (this should be generally avoided as a source). In order to establish how the film is notable we need coverage such as reviews in newspapers or the like. To be honest, it's fairly difficult for short films to gain this type of coverage since they're often overlooked in the media in favor of full length features This brochure should prove to be helpful when it comes to making film articles.

All of that aside, I'm pleased that you're going to continue editing! Wikipedia needs more editors! If you have any questions, let me know - film and literature articles are some of my favorite areas to edit on Wikipedia. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC)