User talk:Hodgdon's secret garden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

censorship[edit]

Note this reversion, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthony_Weiner&diff=432926151&oldid=432926091 which leaves out THE essential item of the entire incident μηδείς (talk)

Nomination of Etch-a-sketch gaffe for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Etch-a-sketch gaffe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etch-a-sketch gaffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

A page you started (Tech4Good awards) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Tech4Good awards, Hodgdon's secret garden!

Wikipedia editor Dicklyon just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good start. I adjust caps per MOS:CAPS and the cited source.

To reply, leave a comment on Dicklyon's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

PROD[edit]

Run-on sentences[edit]

Hello HSG. I have a very minor criticism of your editing, and I hope you won't take it personally... I've noticed that you have a habit of condensing multiple sentences into single, longer sentences, perhaps in an effort to make content more concise. Unfortunately, this sometimes has the effect of making content more difficult to read as it creates complicated run-on sentences. This is a very common pattern on Wikipedia, but I'm hoping that folks will consider the virtues of using discrete short sentences, as research has consistently shown that sentence length is strongly tied to reader comprehension.[1] Anyway, sorry to bug you and thanks for your work on Wikipedia. Kaldari (talk) 15:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Clarice Phelps[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 22 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clarice Phelps, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that nuclear scientist Clarice Phelps has been recognized as the first African-American woman to be involved with the discovery of a chemical element? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clarice Phelps. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Clarice Phelps), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Precious[edit]

U.S. culture and science

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg

Thank you for quality articles such as Shooting of Hosie Miller in 2010, Mormon studies, Jon Huntsman 2012 presidential campaign, Fellowships of the remnants in 2018, and now Clarice Phelps, performed in collaboration, for "Here she is", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2366 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mormon studies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Biden assault allegation for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Biden assault allegation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Biden assault allegation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 🖋 19:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Inappropriate editing[edit]

Please don't use edit summaries to conduct debates as you did here. Use the talkpage for any comments you have on other edits. JungerMan Chips Ahoy! (talk) 22:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:John G. Turner[edit]

Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John G. Turner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - RichT|C|E-Mail 11:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tech4Good awards[edit]

Notice

The article Tech4Good awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not seeing what makes this award pass WP:GNG. BEFORE does not reveal much coverage about the award itself, through there are some passing mentions in articles about the winners. But WP:NOTINHERITED and notable winners do not make each award they win notable as well. Btw, [2] (first hit in GNews) is written by one of the award judges (not independent), and other sources either have similar COI, or as I noted, are passing mentions only.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tara Reade[edit]

Notice

The article Tara Reade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article seems to run foul of WP:ONEEVENT. Ms. Reade's allegations are already detailed at length in the Joe Biden sexual assault allegation. There is no need to restate them here. This article should be deleted or merged into that article. This page was a redirect until today, that should be restored.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

I have converted this to a regular deletion discussion, as it should have been at the beginning. Its nomination page is here.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

"J word" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect J word. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#J word until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 11:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

"Y word" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Y word. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Y word until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 11:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

"O word" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect O word. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#O word until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 11:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tara Reade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congressional intern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Good catch[edit]

Thanks for catching that Reade told WaPo in 2019: "I want to emphasize: It’s not him [Biden]. It's the people around him."" That article further quotes Reade: "Looking back now, that’s my criticism. Maybe he could have been a little more in touch with his own staff." What do you think about that last line? starship.paint (talk) 09:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Keepapitchinin[edit]

Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Keepapitchinin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)