User talk:Horizonlove/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to N'Dea Davenport has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: N'Dea Davenport was changed by Horizonlove (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97826 on 2016-01-23T01:44:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Lady Saw. Thank you.--Michig (talk) 07:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Do not revert again. The sources you added are not reliable, you introduced inconsistent date formats, and you reverted to a version that was not consistent with the Manual of Style. If you don't understand then ask, but please read WP:BLP thoroughly before making any further edits to biographies of living people. If you continue to add unsourced and poorly sourced content you may be blocked from editing. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 06:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

You do not permission to tell me "Do not revert again." My edits were very productive, as your edits are very disruptive. Reliable sources are given to support what I wrote on the page. If I added "unsourced and poorly sourced content" to page, then say specifically what is "unsourced and poorly sourced content". Horizonlove (talk) 08:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with a disruptive user. I have added reliable sources to a page, which he disregards as "unsourced and poorly sourced content". I have added reliable references that support this singer was born on July 12, 1972. I have also added a references that support the claim that Lady Saw is a businesswoman. She is well-known CEO of Diva Records in Jamaica. She owns a recording studio. She also started a foundation known as The Lady Saw Foundation. There were references added to page to support this, but they were removed by User:Michig. I also don't understand why he continues to reverts everyone's edits on that page and dubs it as "no source provided" for which ever user he reverted behind.

Horizonlove (talk) 08:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

I have looked at the relevant editing history, and I will post a message about the dispute at User talk:Michig. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

I have now posted to Michig's talk page. Whether what I wrote there will be helpful remains to be seen, but I hope so. Please do read what I wrote. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:03, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soul II Soul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richie Stephens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Horizonlove. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm TheMagnificentist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to House music have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 11:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kym Mazelle, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. I see vandalism, I remove it or warn the user. I do not need to discuss it prior to the reverting. Discussion shall only be done after revertion and here I am attempting to discuss with you regarding your most recent edit on Kym Mazelle and not about the previous edits/discussions we had on my talk page because that is irrelevant to this. - TheMagnificentist 06:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

You do not have the authority to block me and I did not remove the maintenance templates after you re-added them. And you are not trying to discuss it because you have reverted my edits. Maybe I need to report you because you may need to be blocked indefinitely this time, again. Horizonlove (talk) 06:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

The tags above are merely warnings to your disruptive, non-collaborative behavior on articles. I reverted your edit one time today because you removed the templates added by Karst without addressing the issues. You can report me all you want but I am within my border as I did not do anything to violate the policies here. If you didn't know, reporting someone without evidence is considered personal attack. - TheMagnificentist 07:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

I did address the issues on the talk page of the article. You are coming off very disruptive and combative to several of my edits. That is not a personal attack, that is a reason to report you. Horizonlove (talk) 07:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)