User talk:Hriddxhddx
May 2024
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kyogo Furuhashi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kyogo Furuhashi was changed by Hriddxhddx (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877591 on 2024-05-24T23:26:51+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kyogo Furuhashi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Egsan Bacon (talk) 23:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Glasgow United F.C., you may be blocked from editing. — hako9 (talk) 17:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Seasider53. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jose Mourinho, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)My block
[edit]I feel like the block was insanely harsh as apart from 2 times where I was taking the mick I feel like I've been editing fairly and being extremely helpful so can I potentially get a second chance because that was extremely harsh @ScottishFinnishRadish Hriddxhddx (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also I had 3 warnings which is fair enough but the 4th warning isn't even a disruptive edit, it's literally confirmed so I don't get that at all Hriddxhddx (talk) 17:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I feel like this ban was an abuse of power Hriddxhddx (talk) 17:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
My ban
[edit]
Hriddxhddx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel like the block was insanely harsh as apart from 2 times where I was taking the mick I feel like I've been editing fairly and being extremely helpful so can I potentially get a second chance because that was extremely harsh. Also I had 3 warnings which is fair enough but the 4th warning isn't even a disruptive edit, it's literally confirmed so I don't get that at all. I feel like this ban was an abuse of power
Decline reason:
We have no tolerance for the blatant misogyny you exhibited in the link below. Yamla (talk) 18:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- If you seriously think that there's anything even borderline appropriate about [1], even as a temporary "joke" that you immediately reverted, there's just about no chance you will be unblocked. Coming after some pretty awful editing (unsourced edits, inserting opinions), it's going to be hard for someone to not believe this is a case of WP:NOTHERE. Simply put, this isn't a playground. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Awright then
[edit]@Yamla fucking hell who shat in your cerial mate, you lot take this way to serious. Get a fucking grip of yourself, in what way am I actually vandalising the Jose Cordoba wiki considering it's in the exact state it was before I edited it, also when was I ever "misogynistic" pls give me a link cause I'd love to see where I was misogynistic because I don't even do any wikis on women football. Hriddxhddx (talk) 18:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Awright then 2
[edit]@Yamla Also give me a wiki where I had "poor sourced editing" or whatever you said because apart from the Jose Mourinho one I'd love to see that aswell, no wonder Wikipedia's becoming broke because this is the wokest thing I've ever seen in my life. You lot have to be the most boring and ass hole people I've ever experienced, jesus fucking christ man Hriddxhddx (talk) 18:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't ping me again. I want absolutely nothing to do with you. --Yamla (talk) 18:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit]