User talk:Hstman6576

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Hstman6576. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page twin-turbo, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. In this edit, you indicated you hold patents. Citing your business' website to promote them in anyways is not permitted. Graywalls (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Twin-turbo) for promotional editing an in area where you have a conflict of interest.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you hold the patent for something, you have a conflict of interest. You may still edit the article's talk page; you need to properly declare your COI, and to abide by the guidance given in that link. Consider using edit requests instead of editing the article directly. As an aside, I don't know whether or not you've paid a third party to help you edit here, but I suspect you might have done so. That is never a good idea - the other accounts editing that article are blocked spammers, who are not permitted to contribute here. You would be much better off abiding by our policies and asking volunteers for assistance at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 17:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The content currently provided under Sequential Turbocharger is INACCURATE/FALSE. If Wikipedia wishes to keep having the reputation of having inaccurate content then by all means keep on keeping on. But all of the content under Sequential Turbo is relative to staged twin-turbocharging or also known as staged parallel turbocharging. Where two turbochargers of identical size are used in a staged manner. Meaning one is initially provided all the exhaust gas under light loads until there is enough to provide enough (exhaust gas) for both and then both are simultaneously fed gas. If you actual do research instead of letting people post what they want and not listen inaccurate blogs you'd see that even Porsche themselves do not claim there system to be "sequential" because it is NOT. This goes for the Supra, RX-7 and any other previously claimed "Sequential Turbocharged" vehicle. However, there is an actual apparatus that is available NOW that does perform as a sequential utilizing two completed different frame size turbochargers in sequence and even holds a PATENT. But go ahead and let false news continue to be the headline and reputation of your Wiki services.

Cheers! Hstman6576 (talk) 16:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]