User talk:INDIAN REVERTER2

Main account blocked :( Went to starbucks and made a new account, hehehe.

Rug Article[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bakshaish, you may be blocked from editing. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 01:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

INDIAN REVERTER2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have explained that it is not advertising content. This is not disruptive editing.--INDIAN REVERTER2 (talk) 01:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bakshaish contains some content which was unjustly removed.

Decline reason:

Self admitted block evader. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2017[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- ferret (talk) 01:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]