User talk:INT001

Welcome!

Hello, INT001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Dan saenz

You have recently re-created the article Dan saenz, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review.

This article was deleted through the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Saenz. It may not be rereated without a Deletion Review. Fan-1967 19:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an FYI, {{hangon}} has practically no value in contesting a deletion as a repost. Since you cannot claim it is not a repost, there's nothing to contest.

As I said, the only venue to allow recreation after an Articles for Deletion consensus is Wikipedia:Deletion Review. -- Fan-1967 19:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, do not remove the other tag when adding the {{hangon}} tag. Fan-1967 19:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Fan-1967 19:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did explain the deletion at your colleague's talk page: User talk:RSJ1073. I'll re-post it here:

I have speedily deleted the page Dan saenz as blatant self-promotion and because it was re-created after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Saenz. Please go to deletion review if you object to the deletion. (Don't just re-create the article; it will be deleted.) - Mike Rosoft 23:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]