User talk:Ibeedevinyo
February 2022
[edit] | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tasha Smith have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tasha Smith was changed by Ibeedevinyo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917862 on 2022-02-11T18:35:00+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to Tia Mowry has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Copyright violations also include repeatedly adding copyrighted images to articles. Please stop. SANTADICAE🎅 18:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, these images are not copyrighted so I am unsure how to get past the automatic deletion...
- Ibeedevinyo The photos are taken by two different photographers and appear in numerous magazines, so unless you somehow own the copyright and can prove as much, they cannot exist on Wikipedia. SANTADICAE🎅 18:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
That's news to me as I work with these actresses and am the only one who has these photos so can you please let me know what publications they appear in? We purchased the rights from the photographers to use them as we please....
- Ibeedevinyo You need to first cease editing any of their articles and read WP:PAID and disclose. SANTADICAE🎅 18:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! So if I add
| The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
to the top of this page, I will be permitted to update their photos to the ones we own?Ibeedevinyo (talk)
- No, the copyright status of these images is still uncertain. See you talk page on Commons c:User talk:Ibeedevinyo where at least one use of each image is listed. If you did purchase these images from the photographers then we would need to see the evidence of this. You can email permissions-commons
wikimedia.org including the evidence e.g. the contract between you and the photographers. You also need to change the captioning of both photos - currently you state that they are your own work, which from the comments above is obviously not the case. Even if you do own the copyright, you should attribute the original photographers. You also need to be aware that be releasing the images using the {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} licence you are allowing any one else to use the photos for any purpose they wish anywhere, including making commercial re-use of them, without any further permission being needed. Is that really your desire? Nthep (talk) 19:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for this information, it is very helpful. You may delete the mentioned photos. What would you recommend for us wanting to update their photos to more recent ones? If it can't be seen anywhere else on the internet?
- Well you're going to have to find photos that the copyright holder are happy for others to re-use. It's a basic principle of Wikipedia that as much content as possible is free for others to use. So, while we have a reasonably recent image of Tasha we're not going to permit the use of a non-free photo. You say you work with Tasha, the simplest solution is for you to take a photo and upload that.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tasha Smith. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, your analysis on my edit is completely false. Adding a photo sent directly from the Tasha is not vandalism, it is what I was instructed to do above....
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tasha Smith, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Tasha Smith was changed by Ibeedevinyo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901053 on 2022-02-13T21:57:43+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:57, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
This is the WORST website. Continue to have out-of-date photos then.....Im done trying to fix it. So the above isn't true I take it ? I am not able to update her photo if I own it? Because you keep removing it without giving a proper reason.... Ibeedevinyo (talk)