User talk:Ibn Faqr

November 2017

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Alauddin Khalji without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 02:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Qutb Minar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 03:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

QUTUB MINAR ISSUE

According to the Historians, The Pillar was Elrected on Normal Site which Contains Nothing but A Gupta Rajiya (Tiny Kingdom) pillar, Qutubuddin Haven't Destroyed Temples or Mosques, On the false Claim by Editor the Edition has been done Ibn Faqr (talk) 03:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What reliable sources do you have to support that claim? There are multiple sources cited in the article to support the destruction of temples to build the site. —C.Fred (talk) 03:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]