User talk:Imtiazhassan1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Imtiazhassan1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dawn Consultancy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Buggie111 (talk) 15:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dawn Consultancy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dawn Consultancy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dawnconsultancy.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Buggie111 (talk) 15:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article[edit]

Your article was not acceptable for two main reasons. One was the copyright problem. Even though you may own the site, the text is copyright and is not compatible with Wikipedia's licensing under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and the GFDL for free reuse by anyone anywhere. Apart from this, the whole piece is, as one would expect from a company web site, very promotional, and this is also not allowed on Wikipedia. Other sites like Facebook, Twitter and AboutUs don't seen bothered about copyright in this way - probably because their pages are not available under free license for reuse. They don't worry about the promotional nature of wording either. Nor do they worry about the notability of their clients. Here, a company has to pass our policy on notability for companies WP:CORP, and the vast majority of companies don't. The notability has to be proved with reliable independent sources WP:RS, which is another stumbling block. To answer your question, there is no way your article could be added to Wikipedia as it stood. You would have to read the policies, do some research to find the references, and write in completely new wording while avoiding the PR buzzwords and buzzphrases that were all the way through your text. We insist on totally neutral wording, and in fact we discourage people from writing about their own businesses. (We also don't recommend using edit-for-pay people, as most of them don't do it right anyway - which is how we spot so many of them...). Peridon (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]