User talk:InIt4Me

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InIt4Me (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No evidence shown. I'm a regular auto enthusiast trying to use wikipedia and you block me for no good reason. InIt4Me (talk) 19:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A new editor who appears to understand the nuances of how CheckUser works and whose first edits are removing sockpuppet tags from another indefinitely blocked account's user page? Quite the red flag by itself, but the addition of the same promotional article makes it obvious. Kinu ^t/_c 19:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note for the reviewing admin - please see User talk:Ferris3001 and [this ANI discussion for additional information regarding an influx of paid-editing/promo articles. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:46, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]