User talk:Ineverseeu

Welcome!

Hello, Ineverseeu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 02:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to International marriage agency, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: International marriage agency was changed by Ineverseeu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889442 on 2011-02-23T02:06:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:06, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your edit summaries, it looks like you have concerns about the presentation of certain items in the International marriage agency. Your best approach is to discuss those concerns at Talk:International marriage agency and form consensus about how to fix the article. For instance, I think you have a point about undue weight being given to an incident in the introduction.

That said, the topic should have an article, so nominating it for deletion will likely not lead to any change (other than a week of discussion to determine that it should be kept). —C.Fred (talk) 02:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from International marriage agency, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —C.Fred (talk) 03:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on International marriage agency. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —C.Fred (talk) 03:17, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, your edits are deleting almost half of the character count of the article. This sweeping of a deletion should be discussed at the talk page. Edit summaries are not the place to discuss the situation. You've made a bold edit, it was reverted, and now it's time to discuss the situation. Please either open a discussion on the issue at Talk:International marriage agency or ask for assistance here. If you remove the text again without doing either of the above steps, it will be interpreted as flagrant disregard for guidelines, and your account will be blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 05:57, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In spite of the above warning, you removed the text again with no talk page discussion—and no edit summary this time. Per the above:

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—C.Fred (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]