User talk:Ingrid Rodrigues

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Also please observe WP:BADCHARTS, don't add the brazilhot100 chart to Wikipedia. — Realist² 10:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Barbie Girl. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I have had to remove your addition here, not only was it unsourced but it was also AGAIN in violation of WP:BADCHARTS. — Realist² 20:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emma Bunton discography, you will be blocked from editing. Do not add the Brazil Hot 100 or any other chart listed in WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles.—Kww(talk) 14:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Do not add the Brazil Hot 100, or any other chart listed in WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles.—Kww(talk) 13:53, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Chart question

You've noticed (I hope) that pile of warnings. I don't leave them because I'm some nasty person that hates Brazil ... I just remove bad record charts from all over Wikipedia, and the Hot 100 Brazil is one of those bad charts that I remove. There's a list of all of them at WP:BADCHARTS. I've left questions looking for a good Brazilian chart at Wikiproject Brazil, but no one has responded. If you can help me find a good chart, then I can help put it into articles. If you just keep forcing the Brazil Hot 100 (or the Brazilian Single Chart, which is just a copy), into articles, the warnings will be acted on, and you will be blocked.—Kww(talk) 14:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball or a collection of unverifiable speculation. All information about anticipated events must be verifiable, such as your addition of a release date for an upcoming film in the Spirit in the Dark (Lindsay Lohan album) article. Please do not add information about future events to infoboxes, succession boxes, filmographies, and discographies. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 16:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Please do not wikilink dates, as you did on Lindsay Lohan. Dates should not be linked unless they are demonstrably likely to deepen readers' understanding of the topic. See MOS:UNLINKDATES and WP:OVERLINK. Ward3001 (talk) 16:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ingrid Rodrigues! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 874 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Adriane Garcia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Bop to the Top, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 20:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Ivete Sangalo. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've been away for a while, so I won't immediately ask for you to be blocked, but you know better than this. You have been told time and time again that the Brazil Hot 100 is not an acceptable chart.—Kww(talk) 03:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Enough "final" warnings given

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 48 hours, for disruptive editing, ignoring Talk Page communication. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 22:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)