User talk:Innovamus

Welcome!

Hi Innovamus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Neo-futurism into Future proof. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Maxim_(talk) 22:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Dear Maxim, no question about it, I made a second account: Truce 123. But I did not make it to evade blocks or bans or any other unacceptable reason. Let me tell you what happened, I did my first revision copying text from another article of wikipedia. I was feeling unsecure, I'm not English mother language and what I had to say was so well expressed there... Then Diannaa (talk) wrote me a message about it and I felt really stupid so I decided to cancel my own revision. As I didn't want to look stupid to everyone in the wiki community I opened another account just to cancel MY OWN revision. I'm sure you can check it, that's the only think I did: correcting my previous mistake. Now I realize that I probably doubled my mistake and I wanted to tell you that I'm sorry. I'm new here and I'm making mistakes (but I have all intentions to learn by these mistakes, and I will) That's it, I'm not even asking to be unblocked nor I want/need to use truce123 again. I just felt sorry and I wanted to explain what happened.Innovamus (talk) 04:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)}}[reply]