Trout this user

User talk:Interpuncts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello there. I'm a new user. As I am a human, and not a robot, (I hope...) I'm prone to error. Feel free to correct me, but I'd really prefer it if you didn't attack me in the process. That would be abrasive if you ask me.

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Socialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Britain Stronger in Europe logo.png needs authorship information[edit]

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Britain Stronger in Europe logo.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Interpuncts}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.
If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you.  Seagull123  Φ  11:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm putting this message here because on the image page, there's a big message saying "this file has no author information ... notify the uploader". And as you hadn't received a message about it, I thought you might like to know.  Seagull123  Φ  11:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Elaborated · | (talk - contributions) 15:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

August 2016[edit]

I expect you to follow WP:BRD on the Canada article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

talk:Canada#Representative democracy or not. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Absolutely, I'll respond on the talk page. · | (talk - contributions) 15:05, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Interpuncts. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Interpuncts. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

House of Commons Diagram[edit]

You need to create a new diagram because Labour does not have 262 MP’s or 259 MP’s, it has “258 MP’s.” The diagram is not correct and it needs to be fixed. — User:Social Studies Rules (talk) 09:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC) Social Studies Rules (talk) 01:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

and I did make a new diagram it was deleted Social Studies Rules (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Regardless of the diagram being incorrect, it is a disproportionate step to remove that entire section of the infobox, particularly without talkpage consultation. Be more reserved in the future. · | (talk - contributions) 20:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)