User talk:Inthefuture

Image source problem with Image:Koutsianikoulis2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Koutsianikoulis2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ernesto-valverde.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ernesto-valverde.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appointments

Please provide citations when adding information. Also, the two column box takes up over half the width and is inappopriate. I'm going to revert that, as well as your changing "Appointments/nominees" to "Cabinet" as they are not yet cabinet members, but are his nominees. Please do not revert it again. Grsz ¹¹ ^→Review! 05:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential transition of Barack Obama

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Besides that, please provide citations so your edits can stand.--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How to source an edit

Just read your comment at Grsz11's talk page so here is how you cite an edit. Example: <ref>http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/11/19/pilot.breakdown.ap/index.html?iref=mpstoryview</ref> This will show up in the ref list below (at the article).

Hope this will help.--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 05:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]