User talk:Inyuki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Gediminaiciai[edit]

I'm thinking about moving Jagiellon dynasty to Gediminaiciai, but I'm not sure about that. Do you think these should be two separate articles or one? -- Kpalion 16:10, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Well, with my Lithuanian friends we discussed and actually Jagiellon dinasty is not the same. There is "Jogailaiciu dinastija" and "Gediminaiciu dinastija". These have many connections, but they are not the same. Well, and there is an article in Lithuanian wikipedia about Gediminaiciai dinasty: http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gediminai%C4%8Di%C5%B3_dinastija . They require separate articles. -- Inyuki 17:30, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Jagdterrier[edit]

Thanks for the photos. I added {{PD}} to Image:Jagdterrier lying.jpg and Image:Jagdterrier portrait.jpg for public-domain release, but some people prefer to use {{GFDL}}. Elf | Talk 22:35, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.[edit]

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.

Due to your past contribution to Singularitarianism, you may want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help.

I feel Loremaster is editing Singularitarianism and Technological utopianism in a biased manner in accordance with his Save The Earth propaganda. Loremasters's ideology seems to verge towards Neo-Luddism. Here are the damming facts Loremaster has stated in discussion:

Loremaster says he is:

"...critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms."

Loremaster wants people to:

"...stop indulging in techno-utopian fantasies... ...so that we can all focus on energies on saving the planet."

Loremaster sees his editing as a 'fight' and he states:

"Although I am convinced that the world is in fact heading toward an ecological catastrophe, I think it can be averted and my optimism makes me want to fight to do do just that."

86.174.64.123 (talk) 12:58, 18 December 2010 (UTC)?

  1. LOL
  2. Despite the fact that I openly admit to being a technorealist who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the Technological utopianism article. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding this article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book Citizen Cyborg).
  3. I find it disgusting that User:86.174.64.123 would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment.
  4. In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Wikipedia.

--Loremaster (talk) 13:12, 18 December 2010 (UTC)