User talk:Irfanilyas0786

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is completely unencyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a place for a product review. That's why Amazon exists.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

But this is in the unique formats to understand user's easily therefore i have been submited such article on wikipedia Irfanilyas0786 (talk) 16:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Irfanilyas0786! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Eagleash was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As previously noted, this is outside Wikipedia's remit. Do not submit again unless this item can be made encyclopedic and pass the notability guidelines. To do so might well be seen as disruptive and could lead to the loss of editing privileges.

Eagleash (talk) 17:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)