User talk:IrmaWinston

Welcome!

Hello, IrmaWinston, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for editing with Black Lunch Table! Please reach out if you have any questions!

Heathart (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello IrmaWinston! Your additions to Nadia Huggins have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Hilst [talk] 22:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hilst – thank you for your comments. The material I quoted was in fact written by me for an article for Caribbean Beat and is in the public domain and available for use once the Caribbean Beat article is quoted as a source, which it is. That notwithstanding, I understand Wikipedia's guidelines and I can and will reword my words for here so that they are not so similar to what I originally wrote. As part of my update, I edited the exhibition list but I see that those edits have been removed. Can you please advise as to what the issue was with that listing? I thought that they were correctly cited and linked. Looking forward to hearing back so I can work on the page again. I will also need to look to see if there is a record of the edit as there was a bit of work that went into it. Thanks again. IrmaWinston (talk) 17:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The Caribbean Beat article has no indication that it is in the public domain or licensed under a free license (as explained in WP:DONATETEXT). The edit for the exhibition listing was deleted because the copyrighted material from the previous edit was still present. As for a record of the edit, you could ask Whpq, the admin who performed the RevDel, to undelete it for you. – Hilst [talk] 18:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]