User talk:IronChef

Welcome!

Hello, IronChef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

But there is something you should attend to ...

T-REX

The short answer is it all lies in its success. If the multimodal operation works as intended, such as to reduce traffic or pollution, that's great. If it doesn't, it could be considered a waste of money or poor planning. In New York, we do have an extensive rapid transit system and a lot of traffic. And many people do use multiple modes of transportation. So I cannot say if the city's congestion pricing proposal will or will not work, nor do I dare say whether I am against it or I support it.

I shouldn't really be answering your questions as you raised them: user talk pages are not really for discussion like this. If you want to ask me to give suggestions for the T-REX article, you could, but I don't know if I can help you because I don't know much about the subject. Plus, I normally do not contact people from Wikipedia by e-mail, sorry. TLK^'in 07:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you need guidance on Wikipedia policies, style issues, or anything like that, that I can help you with. I don't need to communicate with you by e-mail to do that. TLK^'in 07:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tinlinkin, Thanks for the note. I'd prefer to stay away from email myself too. Please remove the email address if possible. I agree with your ascertation that large metropolitan areas such as Los Angeles, NYC and London where it seems any change to existing infrastructure is fighting an uphill battle. Good planning is the key to any success-- If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. And especially in New York, it's difficult to say any solution will provide an economical benefit. Some cities for one reason or another don't explore other viable options, and Seattle is one of them. The Multi-modal along with the design build methodology really worked well in Denver and may be something that is a viable option. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IronChef (talk • contribs) 07:51, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

Image copyright problem with Image:JohnWHickenlooper.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JohnWHickenlooper.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Image copyright problem with Image:JohnWHickenlooper.jpg

I have contacted the Denver City and County for confirmation of Fair Rights for this image and/or a PD publicity picture. Thanks! IronChef 07:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Pd_Denver_LouisianaPearlStreet_FromDenverdotGov.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pd_Denver_LouisianaPearlStreet_FromDenverdotGov.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Trex Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Trex Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Thanks Betacommandbot for wasting my time. Please feel free to call the numbers listed in the copyright notice. Additionally, I am sure I can find the logo on a Federal website. Your great. Thanks for building the wall. Watch me break it down.

May I suggest starting with this one: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/images/marketingplan03.gif

Dork with too much freetime. Geez, get a life.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Trex Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Trex Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]