User talk:Isherhope

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chinese Buddhism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chinese Buddhism was changed by Isherhope (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958776 on 2018-05-26T00:13:16+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese Buddhism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The text you added was unsourced or inappropriately sourced (WP:BURDEN). Please see also WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:UNDUE and WP:NOT promotion. JimRenge (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JimRenge. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shorter Sukhāvatīvyūha Sūtra have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. You are adding self-published sources (Trafford Publishing https://www.trafford.com/TraffordAdvantage/default.aspx) to several articles, including Śūraṅgama Sūtra, Social determinants of health. JimRenge (talk) 09:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]