User talk:Ivan Cetnic

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Florin Krasniqi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Florin Krasniqi was changed by Ivan Cetnic (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-07-22T04:26:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Ivan Cetnic, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --JBC3 (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahit Muja. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Mjquin_id (talk) 01:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Sahit Muja, you will be blocked from editing. WuhWuzDat 01:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, There is a high level of vandalism right now...It would have helped a great deal, if you had provided an edit summary...also, if you would create a user page. -- 24.117.23.98 (talk) 01:41, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ivan Cetnic for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 02:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahit Muja. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 15:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

–Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahit Muja has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jamesofur (talk) 04:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Behxhet Uka

A tag has been placed on Behxhet Uka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hrushikesh Tilak (talk) 04:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rezart Taci

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 04:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 04:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ivan Cetnic for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 00:18, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]