User talk:J. Comb

Hello, I'm John Comb, and I am here to use Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, to share my own personal views. This will be a highlight on Wikipedia, captivating my sense on the issues. Enjoy.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J. Comb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was accidentally indefinetly blocked

Decline reason:

No, that was no accident. Not after this. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

John Combs

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J. Comb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what is wrong with that. I told him to shut up. That is free speech. You are violating the constitution.

Decline reason:

Per ample evidence on this talk page, you clearly don't understand Wikipedia, and therefore don't deserve to waste our resources. It is not a public accommodation--you flagrantly and repeatedly violated numerous rules of this private forum even after being told about the concerns, and now you've been evicted. — DMacks (talk) 19:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion of J. Comb On Latin[edit]

A tag has been placed on J. Comb On Latin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Clubmarx (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of J. Comb On Latin[edit]

A tag has been placed on J. Comb On Latin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Clubmarx (talk) 03:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello John Comb, and welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, I have deleted the above article, as it appears you are unaware of a crucial part of Wikipedia policy, that is, it is not a place for people to share there own personal views on a topic, it a repository of information, if you want to give your views, you're better off writing a blog--Jac16888 (talk) 03:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in response to your comment on the talk page, Wikipedia is not a place for your free speech, nor is it a constitutional right for you to write what you want--Jac16888 (talk) 03:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

read WP:NPOV and WP:OR for starters. And reply here by the way--Jac16888 (talk) 03:10, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Jac16888. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, J. Comb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Latium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion _(talk) 19:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maureen Dowd, you will be blocked from editing. The claim you added back with your undo was false, and the cited URL does not support your claim. --an odd name 23:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"vandal" warning[edit]

This edit [1] was a mistake, not vandalism. Twinkle is a useful tool, but you are responsible for the edits you make with it. Wikipedia editors are supposed to assume good faith and not yell "vandalism" every time an error is made. Several other reverts and warnings you have made are of a similar nature, please be more careful in the future. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And this edit [2] is inappropriate, and need we discuss this [3]? Be aware that Twinkle may be removed if it is abused. Acroterion _(talk) 00:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You don't quite seem to understand what Wikipedia is and how it works. You may benefit from the help of a mentor. Click here for more information on this. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Maureen Dowd. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Copy-and-paste page moves[edit]

Hello, J. Comb. Concerning your contribution, Maureen Dowd(woman), a page move cannot be done by simply copying and pasting the contents of a page into a new location, as such a process does not transfer the page's edit history and therefore violates the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). As a violation of the page move process, Maureen Dowd(woman) needs to be temporarily deleted under the speedy deletion criteria so that the page you intended to move may be properly moved in a way that will preserve its edit history. Maureen Dowd(woman) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If not, please refrain from editing either the page you intended to move or Maureen Dowd(woman) until the latter has been deleted according to Wikipedia's speedy criterion G6 (non-controversial housekeeping).

If you did not intend to make a page move, then please insert the {{hangon}} tag right below the {{db-copypaste}} tag in Maureen Dowd(woman) and state your intentions on Talk:Maureen Dowd(woman). An administrator will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. Thank you for your contributions. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle[edit]

I have removed your access to Twinkle and protected the page due to your abuse of the tool. Please review our policies concerning vandalism, assumption of good faith and neutral point of view. Please do not edit-war to reinsert trivia into Maureen Dowd, or to create content forks to suit your personal point of view. In short, slow down, understand our policies, and edit responsibly, or I will block you. You may consider this your final warning.Acroterion _(talk) 03:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acroterion _(talk) 05:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for 48 hours. A repetition of this behavior will result in an indefinite block. Acroterion _(talk) 05:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Acroterion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 20:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Acroterion may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 20:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Acroterion. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 20:08, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]