User talk:J. Telmot

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Someone using this IP address has made unhelpful edits to the page Mac OS X, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you need help, see:

Help contents - the main help page.
Quick guide - a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! 5 albert square (talk) 01:33, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J. Telmot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet.

Decline reason:

Then can you explain why you were repeating the same edits as two other users who were blocked? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

AlistairMcMillan (talk) 01:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

but im not a sockpuppet

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J. Telmot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i read the talk page and i agree that its based on multics

Decline reason:

Does not address the block. Step hen 01:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Obvious sockpuppet[edit]

Disruptive user has been pushing his POV on the Mac OS X talk page for a few days now. No other editors support his completely unique point of view. When he broke the 3RR and edit warring rules he was blocked yesterday. His block expired and he immediately started edit warring again. So I blocked him again for 24 hours at 00:28, September 18, 2009. At 01:28, this account was created and started making exactly the same unique POV edits. An obvious sock-puppet. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 01:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

do you have any proof

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J. Telmot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all i did was edit the page. i agreed with someone that its based on multics. u should have more evidence than that.

Decline reason:

Per WP:DUCK. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.